<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Infrastructure Optimization</title>
	<atom:link href="http://infraops.wordpress.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://infraops.wordpress.com</link>
	<description>Solving problems, one server at a time.</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2008 09:17:37 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=MU</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on A Good Week for MDOP by Focus On IT &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Virtualization Adoption and MDOP</title>
		<link>http://infraops.wordpress.com/2008/05/28/a-good-week-for-mdop/#comment-26</link>
		<dc:creator>Focus On IT &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Virtualization Adoption and MDOP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jun 2008 19:33:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://infraops.wordpress.com/?p=81#comment-26</guid>
		<description>[...] Microsoft's business point of view, their decision to limit the product has not been a bad one: (6.5Million licenses sold to-date, the fastest selling volume-licensing product [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Microsoft&#8217;s business point of view, their decision to limit the product has not been a bad one: (6.5Million licenses sold to-date, the fastest selling volume-licensing product [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A Good Week for MDOP by Virtualization Adoption and MDOP &#171; Infrastructure Optimization</title>
		<link>http://infraops.wordpress.com/2008/05/28/a-good-week-for-mdop/#comment-25</link>
		<dc:creator>Virtualization Adoption and MDOP &#171; Infrastructure Optimization</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jun 2008 19:33:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://infraops.wordpress.com/?p=81#comment-25</guid>
		<description>[...] business point of view, their decision to limit the product has not been a bad one: (6.5Million licenses sold to-date, the fastest selling volume-licensing product [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] business point of view, their decision to limit the product has not been a bad one: (6.5Million licenses sold to-date, the fastest selling volume-licensing product [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on New (old) Blog: The Deployment Guys by navigatum-aestuatum.info</title>
		<link>http://infraops.wordpress.com/2008/02/25/new-old-blog-the-deployment-guys/#comment-18</link>
		<dc:creator>navigatum-aestuatum.info</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 18:26:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://infraops.wordpress.com/2008/02/25/new-old-blog-the-deployment-guys/#comment-18</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;New (old) Blog: The Deployment Guys&lt;/strong&gt;

Ein neuer Besen kehrt gut, Rob West: 

\</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>New (old) Blog: The Deployment Guys</strong></p>
<p>Ein neuer Besen kehrt gut, Rob West: </p>
<p>\</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on About the InfraOps Blog by bibomedia</title>
		<link>http://infraops.wordpress.com/about/#comment-17</link>
		<dc:creator>bibomedia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 09:08:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-17</guid>
		<description>:)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Citrix + Softricity + Microsoft - Softricity = ? by AMD Talk &#187; Citrix + Softricity + Microsoft - Softricity = ?</title>
		<link>http://infraops.wordpress.com/2008/02/26/citrix-softricity-microsoft-softricity/#comment-14</link>
		<dc:creator>AMD Talk &#187; Citrix + Softricity + Microsoft - Softricity = ?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 19:53:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://infraops.wordpress.com/2008/02/26/citrix-softricity-microsoft-softricity/#comment-14</guid>
		<description>[...] Josh Catone wrote an interesting post today onHere&#8217;s a quick excerptPublish MS App Virtualization sequences in XenApp - In addition, it is possible for Citrix XenApp and Microsoft Application Virtualization to work together. Microsoft Application Virtualization packages can be published in XenApp. &#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Josh Catone wrote an interesting post today onHere&#8217;s a quick excerptPublish MS App Virtualization sequences in XenApp - In addition, it is possible for Citrix XenApp and Microsoft Application Virtualization to work together. Microsoft Application Virtualization packages can be published in XenApp. &#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Soon, access your VPN from almost anywhere! by fredatmicrosoft</title>
		<link>http://infraops.wordpress.com/2008/02/13/soon-access-your-vpn-from-almost-anywhere/#comment-10</link>
		<dc:creator>fredatmicrosoft</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 15:28:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://infraops.wordpress.com/?p=33#comment-10</guid>
		<description>Cheers on the info!

-------------------------------------
Fred Reckling
Microsoft 2008 Joint Launch Team
http://www.microsoft.com/2008jointlaunch/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cheers on the info!</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-<br />
Fred Reckling<br />
Microsoft 2008 Joint Launch Team<br />
<a href="http://www.microsoft.com/2008jointlaunch/" rel="nofollow">http://www.microsoft.com/2008jointlaunch/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Office 2007 And AppVirt by gjorgep</title>
		<link>http://infraops.wordpress.com/2008/01/29/office-2k7-and-appvirt/#comment-8</link>
		<dc:creator>gjorgep</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 02:59:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://infraops.wordpress.com/?p=23#comment-8</guid>
		<description>Good one! --It is amazing to think that Microsoft would intentionally design something that is not "virtualizable"  given their own level of investment and the  trends out there..   We need to watch this one closely... (</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good one! &#8211;It is amazing to think that Microsoft would intentionally design something that is not &#8220;virtualizable&#8221;  given their own level of investment and the  trends out there..   We need to watch this one closely&#8230; (</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A Concise History of Microsoft Deployment by Windows Vista News</title>
		<link>http://infraops.wordpress.com/2008/01/28/a-concise-history-of-microsoft-deployment/#comment-7</link>
		<dc:creator>Windows Vista News</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2008 18:00:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://infraops.wordpress.com/?p=21#comment-7</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;A Concise History of Microsoft Deployment&lt;/strong&gt;

Did you see the post at infraops.wordpress.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>A Concise History of Microsoft Deployment</strong></p>
<p>Did you see the post at infraops.wordpress.com</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A Concise History of Microsoft Deployment by AMD Talk &#187; A Concise History of Microsoft Deployment</title>
		<link>http://infraops.wordpress.com/2008/01/28/a-concise-history-of-microsoft-deployment/#comment-6</link>
		<dc:creator>AMD Talk &#187; A Concise History of Microsoft Deployment</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2008 17:56:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://infraops.wordpress.com/?p=21#comment-6</guid>
		<description>[...] mssmallbiz wrote an interesting post today onHere&#8217;s a quick excerptA follow-up to my article on Microsoft Deployment: Michael Niehaus, BDD developer and all-around cool guy wrote a “from-the-horses-mouth” history of Microsoft Deployment, for those of you interested in its evolution: &#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] mssmallbiz wrote an interesting post today onHere&#8217;s a quick excerptA follow-up to my article on Microsoft Deployment: Michael Niehaus, BDD developer and all-around cool guy wrote a “from-the-horses-mouth” history of Microsoft Deployment, for those of you interested in its evolution: &#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A Concise History of Microsoft Deployment by Teste &#187; A Concise History of Microsoft Deployment</title>
		<link>http://infraops.wordpress.com/2008/01/28/a-concise-history-of-microsoft-deployment/#comment-5</link>
		<dc:creator>Teste &#187; A Concise History of Microsoft Deployment</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2008 17:40:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://infraops.wordpress.com/?p=21#comment-5</guid>
		<description>[...] sjvn wrote an interesting post today onHere&#8217;s a quick excerptA follow-up to my article on Microsoft Deployment: Michael Niehaus, BDD developer and all-around cool guy wrote a “from-the-horses-mouth” history of Microsoft Deployment, for those of you interested in its evolution: &#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] sjvn wrote an interesting post today onHere&#8217;s a quick excerptA follow-up to my article on Microsoft Deployment: Michael Niehaus, BDD developer and all-around cool guy wrote a “from-the-horses-mouth” history of Microsoft Deployment, for those of you interested in its evolution: &#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
